In their yearly attempt to breathe life into the global warming lie, the IPCC recently pronounced another round of “were doomed unless” prophesies in hopes of terrifying the general public. While the idea of global warming climate change doesn’t scare me, the global elite and the U.N. do! They want us to reduce carbon dioxide emissions to zero which means either killing off all the human race or taking civilization back 10,000 years before humans began clearing forests for agriculture, neither of which appeals to me.
Think they are joking? Think again. The idea of population control has been a staple of the global elite who have fantasizing about human annihilation for generations. With the baby boomers of WWII, the idea that overpopulation was stunting economic development and stoking political instability took hold sending policy makers on an urgent quest to stop it.
During the 1970’s the Indian government forcibly sterilized millions of women; in 1974, the U.N. organized its first World Population Conference to debate population control and during the 1980s China rolled out its one-child policy. Then the unthinkable happened, by 1994 the fertility rates in most of the world dropped to around the replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman forcing the U.N. to concentrate on other issues of world domination such as global warming.
Climate change became a powerful political scare tactic. Environmentalists spread fear to raise money; politicians supported green initiatives to appear to be saving the earth from doom; the drive-by media fueled the faux scientific sensation while condemning people with common sense; science institutions found they could raise billions in grant money while stoking a feeding frenzy of scary scenarios to produce fear and guilt which raised even more money; the big green machine discovered huge public subsidies [taxpayer money] for projects that would otherwise be economic losers, such as wind farms and solar arrays and the left, wanting their pound of flesh, saw climate change as the perfect means to redistribute America’s wealth to the already wealthy elite with an added bonus of destroying a free country.
But again, the unthinkable happened. The scare wasn’t working the way it should. No matter how many times they slapped lipstick on that pig – it was still a pig. So the next best thing was a 2’fer. For those non-southerners, that means two for the price of one. The left figured out they could gain the upper hand by killing off the fossil fuel industry and eliminating the peons, all in the name of sustainability. And the left breathed a sigh of relief!
Numerous scientific papers such as the one published in 2010 by researchers from the U.S., Germany, and Austria concluded that if the world’s population could be held to only 7.5 billion by midcentury, rather than the 9 billion projected, they could prevent five billion to nine billion fewer tons of carbon dioxide from being spewed into the air by 2050, thereby preventing global warming, that didn’t exist anyway. But there was a problem. The world’s population has already reached 7.244 billion even with the murder of 1.34 million babies. What to do, what to do! Euthanasia and assisted suicide must be persued, for the greater good of course. After all you surely wouldn’t expect someone from the U.N. to say look, one-third of the humans on this earth have to die, so how do you want to go? Don’t think that’s possible?
In 2012, a coalition of scientists claimed that humanity had already exceeded its sustainable population therefore, one out every three people had to agree to die or a government or UN mandate would be required to liquidate them, but either way, people had to start dying. There were a few options discussed according to Cambridge University ecologist Dr. Edwin Peters. We could have a death lottery, incinerate our children, take out an entire race of people, or my personal favorite, just give everyone a shotgun and let them sort it out for themselves. Dr. Peters went so far as to say that “Unfortunately we are well past the point of controlling overpopulation through education, birth control and the empowerment of women. In fact, we should probably kill 300 million women right off the bat.”
Dr. Chelsea Klepper from Perdue, is the leading proponent of a worldwide death day in which 2.3 billion people would just kill themselves en masse at the exact same time. “If we can get the populations of New York City, Los Angeles, Beijing, India, Europe and Latin America to voluntarily off themselves at 6 p.m., EST on June 1, we can kill the people that need to be killed and the planet can finally start renewing its resources.”
Just last October Dr. Eric Pianka, a Texas ecologist and herpetologist suggested during a meeting of the Texas Academy of Sciences that were Ebola to go airborne, it would kill 90% of the human population and instantly solve the “overpopulation problem.” Quoting the Seguin Gazette, Dr. Pianka also said that “everyone who gets to survive has to bury nine. Disease will control the scourage of humanity. We’re looking forward to a huge collapse….”
“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….. To really reduce population, quickly, you have to pull all the males into the fighting and you have to kill significant numbers of fertile age females….” The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa, or through disease like the Black Death….” Thomas Ferguson, U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs