Charity vs. Legalized Theft

“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.  As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”  Benjamin Franklin

Suppose I saw an elderly woman painfully huddled on a heating grate in the dead of winter.  She’s hungry and in need of shelter and medical attention.  To help the woman, I walk up to you using intimidation and threats and demand that you give me $200.00.  Having taken your money, I then purchase food, shelter and medical assistance for the woman.  Would I be guilty of a crime?  A moral person would answer in the affirmative.  I’ve committed theft by taking the property of one person to give to another.

Most Americans would agree that it would be theft regardless of what I did with the money.  Now comes the hard part.  Would it still be theft if I were able to get three people to agree that I should take your money?  What if I got 100 people to agree  — 100,000 or 200 million?  What if instead of personally taking your money to assist the woman, I got together with other Americans and asked Congress to use Internal Revenue Service agents to take your money?

In other words, does an act that’s clearly immoral and illegal when done privately become moral when it is done legally and collectively?  Put another way, does legality establish morality?   Before you answer, keep in mind that slavery was legal; apartheid was legal; the Nazi’s Nuremberg Laws were legal; and the Stalinist and Maoist purges were legal.  Legality alone cannot be the guide for moral people.

I personally believe that assisting one’s fellow man in need by reaching into one’s own pocket is praiseworthy and laudable.  Doing the same by reaching into another’s pockets is despicable, dishonest and worthy of condemnation.

Some people call governmental handouts charity, but charity and legalized theft are entirely two different things.  But as far as charity is concerned, James Madison, the acknowledged father of our Constitution, said ” Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.”  To my knowledge, the Constitution has not been amended to include charity as a legislative duty of Congress.

Our current economic crisis, as well as that of Europe, is a direct result of immoral conduct.  Roughly  two-thirds to three fourths of our federal budget can be described as Congress’ taking the property of one American to give to another through corporate welfare, farm subsidies, subsidized housing, Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, ad nauseam.   

Ayn Rand, in her novel “Atlas Shrugged” reminds us that “when you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good.”

You can read Walter E. Williams article, “Immoral Beyond Redemption”  in full at this link.

Print Friendly

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Unable to load the Are You a Human PlayThru™. Please contact the site owner to report the problem.