Rapture of the Church: Is It A Hoax?

From the beginning of the Christian era until the Protestant Reformation, only one person, Ephraem of Nisibis, in 373 A.D. preached, in one known sermon, that “for all the saints and Elect of God are gathered, prior to the tribulation that is to come, and are taken to the Lord lest they see the confusion that is to overwhelm the world because of our sins.”   The rapture doctrine was not heard of again until the rise of Dispensationalism. 

Margaret MacDonald was born in 1815 in Port Glasgow, Scotland. In early 1826 a few preachers in the area were stressing that the world’s problems could only be solved through an outbreak of supernatural gifts from the Holy Spirit.   It was at this time that two sisters, Isabella and Mary Campbell of the parish of Roseneath manifested charismatic experiences such as speaking in tongues.  Others in the church also began to speak in mysterious tongues.  Modern “Pentecostalism” had its birth.

By 1830 miraculous revelations were being reported by James Campbell as coming from his sister, Margaret MacDonald, who he thought was on the verge of dying from an illness.  Sometime during the period of February through March 1930, Margaret claimed, while seriously ill, she came under the power of the Holy Spirit and experienced manifestations of mingled prophecy and vision.  The message that she received convinced her that Christ was going to appear in two stages at His Second Advent and not a single occasion as most people believed.  The Holy Spirit emanation revealed Christ would first come in glory to those who look for Him and again later in a final stage when every eye would see Him.

Word began to spread throughout Scotland and England of the charismatic experiences in Port Glasgow and the Brethren Church sent John Nelson Darby and Benjamin Wills Newton to investigate.

The first account of Margaret’s utterances was published in 1840 in Norton’s “Memoirs”, pages 171-176 and the second account in 1861 in “The Restoration of Apostles and Prophets”, pages 15-18.

“It was first the awful state of the land that was pressed upon me.  I saw the blindness and infatuation of the people to be very great.  I felt the cry of Liberty just to be the hiss of the serpent, to drown them in perdition.  It was just ‘no God.’ I repeated the words: Now there is distress of nations, with perplexity, the seas and the waves roaring, men’s hearts failing them for fear.  Now look out for the sign of the Son of Man.  Here I was made to stop and cry out, O it is not known what the sign of the Son of Man is; the people of God think they are waiting, but they know not what it is. . .’Tis Christ in us that will lift us up – he is the light -’tis only those that are alive in him that will be caught up to meet him in the air. . .I said, Now shall the people of God have to do with realities, now shall the glorious mystery of God in our nature be known – now shall it be known what it is for man to be glorified.  I felt that the revelation of Jesus Christ had yet to be opened up, it is not knowledge about God that it contains, but it is an entering into God.  I saw that there was a glorious breaking in of God to be.  I felt as Elijah surrounded with chariots of fire. . .I saw the people of God in an awfully dangerous situation, surrounded by nets and entanglements, about to be tried, and many about to be deceived and fall. . .I frequently said that night, and often since, now shall the awful sight of a false Christ to be seen on this earth. . .”

John Nelson Darby was born in London in 1801 and educated at Westminster School and Trinity College, in Dublin, Ireland.  Although an attorney, he was ordained as an Anglican Clergyman in Ireland.  In 1825 he became deacon of the established Church of Ireland but later resigned in protest when the Archbishop of Dublin ruled that converts were obligated to swear allegiance to King George IV as the rightful king of Ireland.  He and a few of his friends began informal meeting to discuss their bible doctrines and from these meetings a new church was formed, the Plymouth Brethren.   The movement spread throughout Europe and England in the years that followed.  Many people think that the originator of the “secret rapture” doctrine came from John Darby, but the truth is, he received the doctrine from the purported visions of Margaret MacDonald.

While some claim that Darby and Newton found the charismatic experiences, and considered their new doctrines demonic, Darby began teaching the new doctrine of the “secret rapture” as early as 1830.  Another sect, the Catholic Apostolic Church headed by Edward Irving also took up the doctrine believing that the Second Coming was imminent because of the outbreak of prophecies and speaking in tongues.

Ernest R. Sandeen, in the “The Roots of Fundamentalism” wrote that Darby introduced the idea of a secret rapture of the Church and a gap in prophetic fulfillment between the 69th and 70th week of Daniel.  These beliefs became basic to the system of theology known as dispensationalism.

Beginning in 1862, Darby lived in and traveled throughout the U.S. and Canada spreading the Brethren message.  When he failed to convert other churches to the Brethren doctrines, he began just preaching his “secret rapture” theory which was made  more popular by Cyrus Scofield’s  “The Scofield’s Reference Bible.”

The 19th century was  the  “gilded age” when Americans believed that the US was on the verge of creating a scientific and technological paradise on earth.   Mark Twain  coined the phrase “gilded age” meaning that the period was glittering on the surface but corrupt underneath.  In the popular view, the late 19th century was a period of greed and guile, scandal ridden politics and vulgar display, which witnessed the birth of modern America and the beginnings of the progressive era.

While it is possible that revelations can come from God it is always prudent to be cautious.  Near the same time that Margaret MacDonald was receiving her visions, in America Joseph Smith was also experiencing his apparitions that brought Mormon doctrines to the world; John Wilson had his dreams that were the spark that started the teaching of British-Israelism; and not long afterward, Ellen G. White received her visions that resulted in many Seventh Day Adventist teachings.  While all four claimed revelation from God, all the doctrines were at variance with one another and contrary to Biblical teachings.

The rapture doctrine is popular in the U.S.  although  not nearly so emphasized in other parts of the world.  David B. Currie in “Rapture: The End-Times Error That Leaves the Bible Behind” summarizes the psychological danger of rapture theology.  “. . .the belief system of rapturists allows them to take a certain comfort in the face of evil.  For when things really deteriorate into chaos, they expect to be safely tucked away in Heaven. . .”

In  truth, the word Rapture is not found in the  original manuscripts or the King James Bible translation.

The basic tenets of the “secret rapture” doctrine are simple –  Christ will come back to this earth in two phases.  He will first return secretly to rapture the Church away from this world so that they might escape the Great Tribulation.  Christ then returns in a visible advent to dispense His wrath on the world’s nations.

Rather than accept man’s word on the rapture, I prefer God’s word.

When the  disciples came to Christ at the Mount of Olives to ask what would be the signs of His return (Matt 24:3) Christ gave them every sign that culminated in His return.  The entire Chapter of Matthew 24 deals with the issue.   In verse 15 Christ says “When ye therefore shall see the Abomination of Desolation (manuscript says Desolator – denoting a person) spoken of by Daniel the prophet stand in the holy place. . .”   Christ was referring to Daniel 9:26-27 which reads  “. . .shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself; and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. . .And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week; and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease. . .”  Daniel speaks of a person not a condition.  The He that Daniel referenced was the Antichrist who comes pretending to be the Christ.  In the Greek language anti means instead of.

In Matthew Chapter 24: 29-30 Christ says “Immediately after the tribution of those days. . .And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.”    

In Revelation Chapter 9, the sixth trump sounds and (Satan) the Antichrist is set loose upon the world.  In Revelation Chapter 11:15 the seventh trump sounded and there were great voices in heaven, saying, “The Kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ, and He shall reign for ever and ever.”  

Revelation 13:7-8   “And it was given unto him (Antichrist) to make war with the saints and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindred and tongues and nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.”   Saint as used in verse 7 is the Greek word “hagios”  meaning sacred, religious, consecrated.   It designates that the Church will  be on this earth during the time the  Antichrist is here. 

Christ taught the disciples that the Antichrist comes first and that He would  only return after the time appointed for the Antichrist,  just as Revelation teaches that the Antichrist comes in the 6th trump and Christ does not return until the 7th trump.  Revelation also teaches that the Antichrist wars after the church which is still on the earth.  

References Used:  The Rapture Cult by Robert L. Pierce; The Incredible Cover-up by Dave MacPherson; Teachers of the Faith and the Future by B.W. Newton and Dr. S.P. Tregelles, 2nd edition

“Apart from the test of the Word, which is the only final one, there are certain reasons why this doctrine should be viewed with suspicion.  It appears to be little more than sixty years old; and it seems highly improbable that if scriptural it could have escaped the scrutiny of the many devoted Bible students whose writings have been preserved to us from the past. 

More especially in the writings of the early Christian fathers would we expect to find some notice of this doctrine, if it had been taught by the Apostles; but those who have their works declare that they betray no knowledge of a theory that the Church would escape the Tribulation under Antichrist, or that there would be any “coming” except that spoken of in Matthew 24, as occurring in manifest glory “after the Tribulation.” 

This is all the more significant because these writers bestowed much attention upon the subject of the Antichrist and the Great Tribulation.  Augustine, referring to Daniel 7, wrote: “But he who reads this passage even half asleep cannot fail to see that the kingdom of Antichrist shall fiercely, though for a short time, assail the Church.”  Edmund Shackleton, “Will the Church Escape the Great Tribulation?” cited by Alexander Reese in “The Approaching Advent of Christ.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 comments for “Rapture of the Church: Is It A Hoax?

  1. Trevor
    May 30, 2012 at 12:51 am

    [Hi Patriots. I read this on the net. BTW, “Ephraem” did not teach pretrib; Google “Deceiving and Being Deceived” by Dave MacPherson. Lord bless you all.]


    How can the “rapture” be “imminent”? Acts 3:21 says that Jesus “must” stay in heaven (He’s now there with the Father) “until the times of restitution of all things” which includes, says Scofield, “the restoration of the theocracy under David’s Son” which obviously can’t begin before or during Antichrist’s reign. (“The Rapture Question,” by the long time No. 1 pretrib authority John Walvoord, didn’t dare to even list, in its scripture index, the too-hot-to-handle Acts 3:21!) Since Jesus can’t even leave heaven before the tribulation ends (Acts 2:34,35 echo this), the rapture therefore can’t take place before the end of the trib! (The same Acts verses were also too hot for John Darby – the so-called “father of dispensationalism” – to list in the scripture index in his “Letters”!)
    Paul explains the “times and the seasons” (I Thess. 5:1) of the catching up (I Thess. 4:17) as the “day of the Lord” (5:2) which FOLLOWS the posttrib sun/moon darkening (Matt. 24:29; Acts 2:20) WHEN “sudden destruction” (5:3) of the wicked occurs! The “rest” for “all them that believe” is tied to such destruction in II Thess. 1:6-10! (If the wicked are destroyed before or during the trib, who’d be left alive to serve the Antichrist?) Paul also ties the change-into-immortality “rapture” (I Cor. 15:52) to the posttrib end of “death” (15:54). (Will death be ended before or during the trib? Of course not! And vs. 54 is also tied to Isa. 25:8 which is Israel’s posttrib resurrection!)
    Many are unaware that before 1830 all Christians had always viewed I Thess. 4’s “catching up” as an integral part of the final second coming to earth. In 1830 this “rapture” was stretched forward and turned into a separate coming of Christ. To further strengthen their novel view, which the mass of evangelical scholars rejected throughout the 1800s, pretrib teachers in the early 1900s began to stretch forward the “day of the Lord” (what Darby and Scofield never dared to do) and hook it up with their already-stretched-forward “rapture.” Many leading evangelical scholars still weren’t convinced of pretrib, so pretrib teachers then began teaching that the “falling away” of II Thess. 2:3 is really a pretrib rapture (the same as saying that the “rapture” in 2:3 must happen before the “rapture” [“gathering”] in 2:1 can happen – the height of desperation!).
    Other Google articles on the 182-year-old pretrib rapture view include “Pretrib Rapture Politics,” “Pretrib Rapture Scholar Wannabes,” “Famous Rapture Watchers,” “Pretrib Rapture Diehards,” “X-Raying Margaret,” “Edward Irving is Unnerving,” “Thomas Ice (Bloopers),” “Walvoord Melts Ice,” “Wily Jeffrey,” “The Rapture Index (Mad Theology),” “America’s Pretrib Rapture Traffickers,” “Roots of (Warlike) Christian Zionism,” “Scholars Weigh My Research,” “Pretrib Hypocrisy,” “Appendix F: Thou Shalt Not Steal,” “Thieves’ Marketing,” “Pretrib Rapture Secrecy,” “Deceiving and Being Deceived,” “Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty,” and “Christ’s return is NOT imminent!” – all by the author of the bestselling book “The Rapture Plot” (see Armageddon Books).

  2. Stephanos
    June 13, 2012 at 5:44 pm

    I too was brought up on the pretrib rapture idea but was never quite comfortable with it. Over the last few years having the time to really prayerfully examine this teaching, I experienced a gut wrenching process that I was confronted with. I had to acknowledge my deception in the face of others who live and die on this deception. Being in the fellowship of the Brethren myself, I found myself feeling as if I was a turncoat and the sharp reaction I have recieved from those in the Brethren Assembly has left me quite saddened. Instead of having a decent discussion a wall of angry reaction was thrown up. I began to see more and more that the enemy has so sown this lie into the western church that he realizes that if ever expeosed his plan for the church, too easily fall away will be thwarted

  3. Samuel
    January 7, 2013 at 7:12 pm

    Ephraem did not teach a pretrib rapture. His sermon, which is on the web, stated that the only thing that appeared to him to be imminent was the arrival of the wicked one (Antichrist). The distinctive aspects of the catching up of I Thess. 4 are only in the last section which deals with the coming to earth in Matt. 24. For more info see MacPherson’s Google article “Deceiving and Being Deceived” and Dr. Robert Gundry’s book “First the Antichrist.”

  4. Monica
    January 10, 2013 at 3:51 pm

    / I just found your blog and also found the following recently. /

    Pretrib Rapture Pride

    by Bruce Rockwell

    Pretrib rapture promoters like Thomas Ice give the impression that they know more than the early Church Fathers, the Reformers, the greatest Greek New Testament scholars including those who produced the KJV Bible, the founders of their favorite Bible schools, and even their own mentors!
    Ice knows that his own mentor, Dallas Sem. president John Walvoord, was unable to find anyone holding to pretrib before early 19th century British teacher John Darby – and Walvoord called Darby and his Brethren followers “the early pretribulationists” (RQ, pp. 160-62). By claiming to find “imminence” in the 1st and 2nd century Fathers, Ice knows that his followers can change “imminence” in their mind to “pretrib” – but Ice is reluctant to admit that whenever any of those Fathers seemed to hold to “imminence, it was because they thought they were then in the tribulation and were near the end of it!
    Google “Famous Rapture Watchers” to see the rapture view that Walvoord said “has long been a common doctrine held by the majority of the church” (RQ, p. 127). Note how those unsurpassed lexicon and Greek grammar experts interpreted Rev. 3:10 which pretrib promoters often claim is the greatest Biblical proof for an any-moment pretrib rapture.
    Journalist/historian Dave MacPherson has focused since 1968 on the pretrib rapture’s long-covered-up, 183-year-old history. His habit has been to examine Darby’s earliest writings and then painstakingly search for the earliest occurrences of certain words and phrases like “coming for,” “coming with,” “rapture,” “imminence,” “any moment,” etc. Since several of Darby’s contemporaries have at times been nominated for the title of “Pretrib Rapture Originator,” MacPherson has done the same laborious word-and-phrase search in the earliest writings of Macdonald, Norton, Irving, etc.
    Since many pretrib promoters favor the King James Version of the Bible, it’s interesting that the other writings of the KJV translators that are in the British Library in London (where MacPherson has researched) don’t have even a hint of a pretrib rapture! Is it possible that Ice and other pretrib merchandisers have found proof of pretrib in the KJV that even the KJV translators couldn’t find?
    Pretrib didn’t flourish in America much before the 1909 Scofield Bible which has pretribby “explanatory notes” in its margins. Not seen in the margins was jailed forger Scofield’s criminal record throughout his life that David Lutzweiler has documented in his recent book “The Praise of Folly” which is available online.
    Even some well-known evangelical schools have played fast and loose with pretrib. MacPherson’s “The Rapture Plot” – the most documented and accurate work on pretrib dispensationalism’s history (Google “Scholars Weigh My Research”) – includes on p. 222 Biola’s original doctrinal statement which stated that the “Lord Jesus is coming again to his earth, personally, bodily, and visibly.” Later on, those who evidently felt superior to the founders added this Scofield-like “explanatory note” which says that “the return of the Lord for His Church will be premillennial” and “before the Tribulation.” (Also Google “Pretrib Hypocrisy.”)
    Although Ice’s mentor John Walvoord couldn’t find any pretrib teacher before 1830, Ice has been “honoring” Walvoord by promoting some pseudo-scholars who claim they’ve found pre-1830 existence of pretrib! (Google MacPherson’s “Deceiving and Being Deceived” for the details.)
    Ice, BTW, has a “Ph.D” issued by a tiny Texas school that wasn’t authorized to issue degrees! Ice now says that he’s working on another “Ph.D” via the University of Wales in Britain. For light on the degrees of Ice’s scholarliness, Google “Bogus degree scandal prompts calls to wind up University of Wales,” “Thomas Ice (Bloopers),” and “be careful in polemics – Peripatetic Learning.”
    Another pretrib trafficker, Hal Lindsey, asserts on p. 124 in “The Late Great Planet Earth” that the famous Egyptian Sphinx has the head of a woman even though encyclopedias say it’s the head of a man!
    In a Google article “Pretrib Expert John Walvoord Melts Ice,” Ice’s mentor demolishes Ice’s desperate assertion that the “falling away” in II Thess. 2 is a pretrib rapture! (Ice should have said that the TEACHING of such a rapture is a falling away!)
    Can anyone guess who the last proud pretrib rapture holdout will be?

  5. Ken
    July 22, 2018 at 12:15 pm

    I am thankful to my Father in Heaven that He lead me to the Shepherd’s Chapel. I never believed in the rapture,even though I studied everything I could about it for several years,it did not make sense. Why would some be raptured and others through out the ages had to die for their faith?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *