THE FOUNDERS DIDN’T WANT AMERICANS ARMED WITH WEAPONS OF SPORT

Robert Francis Couldn’t Be More Wrong. The “Nicknamed Candidate” Beto has no clue about firearms.

Our forefathers fought our British oppressors with weapons of war. The “Nicknamed Candidate” for president, this Beto fellow, thinks the Founders couldn’t imagine us armed properly with weapons of war. We had the most sophisticated weapons of war imaginable in the late 1700s, weapons capable of fighting and defeating the most powerful army on the planet. That was the plan. It still is. The Second Amendment codifies this for the Militia–our People.

This person running for president as Beto must be a fool. His understanding of history stops short of any comprehension of why we are armed. We are armed as a balance of power, a threat to the existing order if it gets out of line. It keeps us free. You don’t do that subarmed, with weapons of sport, or weapons of hunting ducks. Americans must have parity with police and infantry. To the extent we do not, we are subject to subjugation and frankly, that balance is slipping, and so tyranny creeps closer. Any careful observer can see that’s true, and frightening.

Using a handful of psychotic maniacs who senselessly murder unarmed civilians as leverage to disarm the entire populace is emblematic of exactly who you do not want to elect or even listen to for advice. Asking the nicknamed candidate, riding a child’s skateboard–which didn’t even exist in Colonial times–for advice on how to run the country, is a fool’s game. The fact that our so-called “news” media would give him serious consideration may be the second biggest problem we face. Not just fake news, but fraudulent reporting, misleading the body politic, using a putz as a pundit.

/jpfo.org

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *