Shades of Fascism

On 19 September 2016, 193 UN member states met to discuss issues related to immigration and, in adopting the NY Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, proclaimed the need for enhanced cooperation at the global level. After years of negotiating, in December 2018, 164 countries signed the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. 

While “non-binding” the compact does contain provisions that clearly signal that the UN would not be happy with any country that disagrees with its open border agenda.   Missing from the ranks of the signers was the United States.  While Obama fully supported the idea of forced open borders, President Trump made it clear he wanted nothing to do with the compact because it would negate American sovereignty.

Unlike Trump however, The European Union is now attempting to make the compact legally binding even on those European countries that did not sign it according to “secret documents” made public by the EU’s legal services who formulated “lengthy and devious” legal grounds for “suggesting” that the compact is mandatory.

In January of this year, UN Secretary General Gutteres announced another initiative to help advance their open border policy.  He claimed that “poisonous views are penetrating political debates and polluting the mainstream.”  Anyone willing to hazard a guess what he was referring to?  Hate Speech, of course, especially where it concerns immigrants, regardless of their country of origin.   Now the UN is looking to bring a team together to define a strategy and present a global plan of action against hate speech and hate crimes.  Oh joy!

Hate speech is, according to the UN, “any communication in speech, writing or behavior that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or group on the basis of who they are.”   Translation:  No one is allowed to talk against anyone based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, color, descent, gender of other identity factor.  Wow!  Under this definition, all speech is hate speech.  Shades of fascism and the rise of Hitler!

Just last month Guterres presented the UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech during which he reminded the world that “to those who insist on using fear to divide, we must say: diversity is a richness, never a threat….We must never forget, after all, that each of is an “other to someone, somewhere.”  Don’t you just want to hug him?

And naturally, they have no intention of stifling free speech – they just want to tone it down a smidgen, especially the kind that challenges the UN’s agendas like abortion on demand, open borders, a one world government, etc.  Bless their hearts!

What a brave new world we face in which the UN will not only define hate speech but promote measures to ensure that the rights of victims are upheld and their needs addressed, including advocacy for remedies, access to justice and psychological counselling.  Be still my beating heart!

.Of course, in order for this brave new world to exist they must have access to your children so they can further indoctrinate them in the value of tolerance, pluralism, and global citizenship.  And because they knew the world would agree, they have already planned an international conference on Education for Prevention with focus on addressing and countering  hate speech, the results of which will no doubt coming to a school near you.

Are you sick yet?  Well if not let me add that all this crap plays straight into the decade’s long attempt of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) plan to ban any and all criticism of Islam.  In the wake of the launch of Guterres’ action plan, Pakistan has already presented a six point plan “to address the new manifestations of racism and faith-based hatred, especially Islamophobia” at the UN’s headquarters in NY, which, by the way, was organized by Pakistan along with Turkey,  Pope Francis and the UN.

Can anyone say allah?

“The concept of “micoagression”  is just one of many tactics used to stifle differences of opinion by declaring some opinions to be “hate speech,” instead of debating those differences in a marketplace of ideas. To accuse people of aggression for not marching in lockstep with political correctness is to set the stage for justifying real aggression against them.”   Thomas Sowell

Source:  UN Launches All-out War on Free Speech  by Judith Bergman

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *