Sneaky Executive Action on Gun Control

Obama was quietly working behind the scenes to craft laws and regulations that will further erode the Second Amendment, while we were focused on the Boston bombings.

The Obama Administration has taken another significant step against Americans’ right to bear arms – and they’re doing it through Presidential Executive Action, a strategy that, once again, bypasses Congressional oversight and the legislative process.

It appears that the BHO Administration is taking executive action on firearms importation. Take a few minutes to read this: After Senate setback, Obama quietly moving forward with gun regulation. Here is the key portion of the article:

“The Importation of Defense Articles and Defense Services — U.S. Munitions Import List references executive orders, amends ATF regulations and clarifies Attorney General authority “to designate defense articles and defense services as part of the statutory USML for purposes of permanent import controls,” among other clauses specified in heavy legalese requiring commensurate analysis to identify just what the administration’s intentions are. Among the speculations of what this could enable are concerns that importing and International Traffic in Arms Regulations [ITAR] may go forward to reflect key elements within the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.”[Emphasis added.]

Depending on how it is implemented, the implications of this change could be huge. With the stroke a of a pen and without the consent of Congress, ATF bureaucrats could make ANY gun part or accessory (including magazines) or ammunition that were originally manufactured or perhaps even those designed for military use no longer legal for importation for civilian use.

It is strongly recommend that you stock up on magazines, ammunition and spare parts for any of your imported military pattern guns, as soon as possible! Once an import ban is implemented, prices will skyrocket.

Just a few days ago the President vowed to push forward on gun control without Congress and [Dipstick] Nancy Pelosi argued that no matter what Congress says, gun control is inevitable.

Obama said recently that the American people have spoken, and that they want guns to be restricted, banned and heavily regulated.

If that’s so, then how is it that a bipartisan Congress overwhelmingly rejected the President’s bid to restrict and outlaw private ownership of millions of weapons and gun accessories? source: shtfplan

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *