In 1969 U.N. Secretary General U Thank said that “members of the United Nations have perhaps ten years left in which to subordinate their ancient quarrels and launch a global partnership to curb the arms race, to improve the human environment, to defuse the population explosion, and to supply the required momentum to developments efforts. . .”
As usual, the little god-heads in charge reached the conclusion that exponential population growth, free-market production and pollution could not continue or the earth would be damned. In their first draft of the Global Assessment Report, they determined that “a reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.”
As you can see, the U.N. was using scare tactics to lay the foundation of a one world government as early as 1969. Their prediction that the earth could only sustain only between 1 and 4 billion at the most, without any legitimate evidence to back up their claim, was a joke or would have been a joke if the world governments weren’t so corrupt.
And it continues today as this Communist organization parked in our own backyard is still predicting doom and gloom if we as a society don’t control the population, the environment, global warming, guns, ad nauseam. Taken as a whole it is easy to see that the push for population control and the confiscation of firearms are all part of the world government agenda because most tyrants know that a small unarmed population is much easier to control.
Then, of course, you have those die hard environmentalist nuts and left-wing elitists who think they know better than the peasants and want to play god. Just look at Ted Turner. Back in 1996 he said the world’s population should only be between 250-300 million. But, I’d like to add – he didn’t volunteer to be the first to bite the dust to achieve this goal. More recently he predicted that by 2040 most of the world’s crops would be dead and the people in the same state of decay and what few were left would become cannibals. I think he’s been watching too many zombie movies.
David Pimentel a Cornell professor said in 1994 that “the total world population should be not more than 2 billion, with only 100 to 200 million in the U.S. To achieve this goal, humans must first stabilize their population and then gradually reduce the number to achieve a sustainable society. . .With fair policies and realistic incentives, such a reduction in the human population can be achieved over the next century.” Translation: We stabilize the population by killing off the unborn, sterilizing women, limiting the number of number of children they can have, and killing off the elderly and disabled through socialized medicine.
Then there was Obama’s former Science and Technology czar, John Holdren who in 1973 said that the U.S. population of 210 million, at that time, was too many and he wanted to see near zero population growth before the year 2000. In 1977 book he advocated forced abortion which he said “could be sustained under the “existing” Constitution'” mass sterilization of humans through drinking water which would be okay “as long as it doesn’t harm livestock;” and government control over life and death. “Perhaps agencies combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime [one world government] – sort of an international superagency for population, resources and environment”.
Still there are others like Warren Buffett who, rather than make public statements on population control, prefer to let their money do the talking. Buffett has given millions to Planned Parenthood, Pathfinders Int’l, the Population Control Council, etc. George Soros who has 5 kids is concerned the rest of the “little people” are having too many. He also supports Planned Parenthood and several U.N. agencies concerned with population control.
Bill Gates introduced a plan in which the use of cell phone technology would register every birth in a newborn vaccination data base which he called the “key” to reducing population because the better the survival rate of children, the less children parents would have. The logic of that statement evades me. Since 1994 the Gates Foundation has given millions to the International Planned Parenthood Federation Fund which is a direct participant in China’s one-child policy.
Are they making a case for mass exterminations in the future under the name of sustainability? Hilter already tried that with the Jews and he didn’t call it murder either – it was “necessary cleansing”.
The radical environmentalist and elitist of the world have found their answer – radical population control, a global welfare system operated by a one-world government, total disarmament and earth centered spirituality [Gaia worship].
How do you fight back? The only way we can – by cleansing our government of corruption, by elminiating special interest money, by standing up for our God given rights, and by voting the fools out of office that are trying to sell us down the river.